Comparative evaluation of grafting time and techniques for Mangifera indica L. under subtropical conditions of Himachal Pradesh

Downloads

Published

2026-06-30

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58993/ijh/2026.83.2.6

Keywords:

Mango, wedge grafting, veneer grafting, propagation, graft success rate, graft survival
Dimensions Badge

Issue

Vol. 83 No. 02 (2026): Indian Journal of Horticulture

Section

Research Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2026 Nischala Arya, Shiv Kumar Shivandu

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors

  • Nischala Arya Department of Fruit Science, Dr. Yashwant Singh Parmar, College of Horticulture and Forestry, Neri, Hamirpur 177001, Himachal Pradesh, India
  • Shiv Kumar Shivandu Division of Fruit and Horticultural Technology ICAR-Indian Agriculture Research Institute, New Delhi 110012, India; Geeta University, Panipat 132145, Haryana, India

Abstract

The success of mango grafting varies with technique and seasonal timing, particularly under the subtropical conditions of Himachal Pradesh. This study evaluated two grafting methods—wedge and veneer—across six different months (July, August, September, October, February, and March). Observations were recorded on graft success, bud break, leaf emergence, sprout length, plant height, number of leaves, leaf area, graft survival, and saleable plants. The results revealed that veneer grafting in August was significantly superior, exhibiting the highest graft success rate (70.00%), earliest bud break (16.33 days), and leaf emergence (17.62 days). Veneer grafting also outperformed wedge grafting in terms of plant growth and survival parameters. Based on these findings, veneer grafting during August is recommended as the most effective method for mango propagation in subtropical regions of Himachal Pradesh, ensuring optimal success and plant quality.

How to Cite

Arya, N., & Shivandu, S. K. (2026). Comparative evaluation of grafting time and techniques for Mangifera indica L. under subtropical conditions of Himachal Pradesh. Indian Journal of Horticulture, 83(02), 171–177. https://doi.org/10.58993/ijh/2026.83.2.6

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Thakor NJ. 2019. Indian mango–production and export scenario. Peach, 18, 0-12.

2. Rana VS, Sharma S, Rana N, Kumar V, Sharma U, Modgill V and Prasad H. 2023. Underutilized fruit crops in North-Western Himalayan region under changing climatic scenario. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 70: 37-69.

3. Antwi-Boasiako, A., Amponsah, P., Opoku, J. A., Coulibaly, D., & Mintah, P. 2024. Increasing Mango Production Efficiency under the Fast-Changing Climate. In Abiotic Stress in Crop Plants-Ecophysiological Responses and Molecular Approaches. IntechOpen.

4. Majumdar, P. K., & Rathore, D. S. 1970. Bench grafting in mango.

5. Ullah SS, Malik S, Prakash S and Singh MK. 2017. Standardization of time and technique of grafting for quality production of nursery plants of Amrapali mango (Mangifera indica L.). J Pharmacogn Phytochem.;6:14–17.

6. Karna AK, Varu DK, Panda PA and Hota D. 2017 Standardization of grafting time and height on success of softwood grafting in mango (Mangifera indica L.). J. Pharmacogn. Phytochem. 6:2803-7.

7. Matsushita M. 2025 Combining the optimal grafting methods, seasons and scion donors enhances the conifer grafting success and early supply of the next-generation seedlings. Canadian Journal of Forest Research. 16.

8. Gupta O, Jawanda J and Sharma K. 1988. Stone Grafting in Mango Under Jammu Conditions. Indian J Hortic.45:268-270.

9. Yadav D and Singh SP. 2018. Vegetative methods of plant propagation: I-cutting layering and budding. J Pharmacogn Phytochem. 7:3267-3273.

10. Kaur S, Boora RS and Singh D. 2020. Propagation studies in sapodilla [Manilkara zapota (L.) P. Royen]: A Review. Agricultural Reviews.41:356-63.

11. Islam MR and Rahim MA. 2010. Performance of epicotyl grafting in different varieties of mango. J Agrofor Environ. 4:45-50.

12. Singh RR, Karuna K, Kumar A and Mankar A. 2012. Studies on the effect of time and methods of grafting on success and growth of mango graft. Prog Hortic. 44:151-154.

13. Kumar S, Sant R and Singh CP .2000. Success of veneer and cleft grafting at different grafting heights of seedling rootstocks in Dashehari Mango. Indian J Hortic. 57:212-214.

14. Nayak G and Sen SK. (2000) Evaluation of vegetative propagation methods of mango (Mangifera indica L.). Environ Ecol. 18(1):243-245.

15. Sabeky E. 2005. Study and determination of the best time and method for mango grafting in Bahukalat, Sistan Baluchestan Province. J Sci Technol Agric Nat Resour. 9(1):91-101. Available from: http://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.22518517.1384.9.1.7.0.

16. Mng'Omba SA, Akinnifesi FK, Sileshi G and Ajayi OC. 2010. Rootstock growth and development for increased graft success of mango (Mangifera indica) in the nursery. Afr J Biotechnol. 9:1317-1324.

17. Gotur M, Sharma DK, Chawla SL, Joshi CJ and Navya K. 2017. Performance of wedge grafting in guava (Psidium guajava L.) under different growing conditions. Plant Archives.17:1283-7.

18. Visen A, Singh JN, Singh SP. 2010. Standardization of wedge grafting in guava under North Indian plains. Indian Journal of Horticulture.67:111-4.

19. Habibi F, Liu T, Folta K and Sarkhosh A. 2022. Physiological, biochemical, and molecular aspects of grafting in fruit trees. Hortic Res.9: uhac032.

20. Chophel S and Dorji K. 2018. Graft Responses to three different techniques in Mango (Mangifera indica L.) under Bhutanese nursery conditions. Bhutanese Journal of Agriculture.

21. Shivendu SK. 2020. Studies on the effect of pre-sowing treatments and time of wedge grafting on production of saleable grafts in mango (Doctoral dissertation, COLLEGE OF HORTICULTURE AND FORESTRY, DR YSP UHF, NERI, HAMIRPUR).

22. Islam MN, Rahim MA and Farooque AM. 2004. Standardization of time and grafting techniques in mango under Bangladesh condition. Asian Journal of Plant Sciences. 3: 378-386

23. Majeed A, Kumar M, Prakash S, Singh MK, Kumar A. 2015. Effect of Time of Defoliation of Scion Stick and Time of Veneer Grafting on Survival and Root Growth of Graft in Mango (Mangifera Indica L.). Annals of Horticulture.8:205-7.

24. Hart AT, Landhäusser SM, Wiley E. 2024. Tracing carbon and nitrogen reserve remobilization during spring leaf flush and growth following defoliation. Tree Physiology. 29:015. https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/tpae015

25. Dewangan S, Ramteke V, Sharma GL, Chandrakar T, Singh DP, Netam RS, Adiga JD and Panigrahi HK. .2023. Grafting month and environmental condition influences on the success of softwood grafting in Cashew under Bastar region of Chhattisgarh. Emergent Life Sciences Research. 9:83-92.

26. Kaur S, Boora RS, Singh D and Singh G. 2022. Standardization of propagation techniques in sapodilla [Manilkara achras (Mill.) Fosberg] Cv. Kalipatti under North Indian conditions. Agricultural Research Journal.;59(6):1119-24.

27. Sadeghi-Majd R, Vahdati K, Roozban MR, Arab M and Sutyemez M. 2022 Optimizing environmental conditions and irrigations regimes can improve grafting success in persian walnut. Acta Scientiarum Polonorum. Hortorum Cultus.;21(2).

28. Abdel-Mohsen MAA and Rashedy AA. 2024. Callusing soil of grafted grape cuttings as a positive feature for climate change. Revista Brasileira de Fruticultura, 46, e-019.

29. Pandey V and Singh JN. 2001. Effect of scion cultivars, dates of grafting and levels of antitranspirant on success and survival stone grafting of mango (Mangifera indica L.). Orissa Journal of Horticulture, 1:79-83

30. Nayak G and Sen SK. 2000. Evaluation of vegetative propagation methods of mango (Mangifera indica L.). Environ Ecol. 18(1):243-245.

31. Sabeky E. 2005. Study and determination of the best time and method for mango grafting in Bahukalat, Sistan Baluchestan Province. J Sci Technol Agric Nat Resour. 9(1):91-101. Available from: http://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.22518517.1384.9.1.7.0.

Similar Articles

<< < 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.