Impact of pre-harvest fruit bagging on visual appeal, texture and yield attributes of guava (Psidium guajava L.) cv. Lucknow-49

Published

2026-09-30

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58993/ijh/2026.83.3.18

Keywords:

Baaging, guava, yellow polythene, non-woven bag, yield attributes.
Dimensions Badge

Authors

  • Abdullah Zaid Research Scholars, Department of Fruit Science, Banda University of Agriculture & Technology, Banda 210001, Uttar Pradesh, India
  • Bijendra Kumar Singh Assistant Professor, Department of Fruit Science, Banda University of Agriculture & Technology, Banda
  • Anand Singh Professor, Department of Fruit Science, Banda University of Agriculture & Technology, Banda
  • Vigya Mishra Assistant Professor, Department of Post Harvest Technology, Banda University of Agriculture & Technology, Banda
  • Bhawna Singh Research Scholars, Department of Fruit Science, Banda University of Agriculture & Technology, Banda 210001, Uttar Pradesh, India

Abstract

Pre-harvest fruit bagging is an eco-friendly technique that can improve fruit quality and appearance by
modifying the microenvironment surrounding developing fruits. The present investigation was conducted
during 2022–23 at Banda University of Agriculture and Technology, Banda, Uttar Pradesh, to evaluate the effects
of different bagging materials on the visual appeal, texture, and yield attributes of guava (Psidium guajava L.)
cv. Lucknow-49. Eight treatments, including newspaper, butter paper, transparent polythene, black polythene,
yellow polythene, brown paper, non-woven bags, and an unbagged control, were evaluated in a randomized block
design with three replications. Significant differences were observed among treatments for fruit colour, texture,
and yield attributes. Transparent polythene bagging produced the brightest fruits (L* = 60.45), while brown paper
bags recorded the highest redness (a* = 5.62). Unbagged fruits exhibited the highest yellowness (b* = 23.45).
Yellow polythene bags produced the firmest fruits, with maximum hardness (987.09), gumminess (609.92), and
chewiness (693.78). Non-woven bagging proved superior for most yield attributes, resulting in earlier maturity
(66.00 days), highest yield (27.61 kg/plant), fruit length (8.98 cm), diameter (9.07 cm), weight (201.04 g), volume
(199.88 cc), flesh thickness (4.27 cm), and pulp weight (152.83 g). Brown paper bags recorded the highest seed
number (169.00). Overall, non-woven bags were most effective for improving yield and physical attributes,
whereas transparent polythene and brown paper enhanced fruit colour and market appeal. Thus, pre-harvest
bagging offers an effective non-chemical approach for improving guava yield and quality.

How to Cite

Zaid, A., Singh, B. K., Singh, A., Mishra, V., & Singh, B. (2026). Impact of pre-harvest fruit bagging on visual appeal, texture and yield attributes of guava (Psidium guajava L.) cv. Lucknow-49. Indian Journal of Horticulture, 83(03), 385–391. https://doi.org/10.58993/ijh/2026.83.3.18

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Amarante, C., Banks, N.H. and Max, S. (2002). Effect of preharvest bagging on fruit quality and postharvest physiology of pears (Pyrus communis). N.Z. J. Crop Hort. Sci. 30(2): 99–107.

2. Brummell, D.A. and Harpster, M.H. (2001). Cell wall metabolism in fruit softening and quality and its manipulation in transgenic plants. Plant Mol. Biol. 47(1-2): 311–340.

3. Gross, J. (1991). Pigments in vegetables: Chlorophylls and carotenoids. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York.

4. Harker, F.R., Maindonald, J., Murray, S.H., Gunson, F.A., Hallett, I.C. and Walker, S.B. (1997). Sensory interpretation of instrumental measurements: Texture of apple fruit. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 11(2): 113–123.

5. Islam, M.T., Rahman, M.M. and Hossain, M.M. (2019). Effect of pre-harvest fruit bagging on quality and shelf life of guava. J. Hortic. Sci. Ornam. Plants 11(2): 85–92.

6. Jain, N., Dhawan, K., Malhotra, S. and Singh, R. (2003). Biochemical changes during ripening of guava (Psidium guajava L.). Plant Foods Hum. Nutr. 58(4): 309–315.

7. Kays, S.J. and Paull, R.E. (2004). Postharvest biology. Exon Press, Athens, Georgia.

8. Lancaster, J.E., Lister, C.E., Reay, P.F. and Triggs, C.M. (1997). Influence of pigment composition on skin colour in fruit and vegetables. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 122(4): 594–598.

9. Mitra, S.K. (2012). Postharvest physiology and storage of tropical and subtropical fruits. CAB International, Wallingford, UK.

10. Mitra, S.K. and Bose, T.K. (2007). Guava. In: Bose, T.K., Mitra, S.K. and Sanyal, D. (eds.), Fruits: Tropical and Subtropical, Vol. 1, Naya Udyog, Kolkata, pp. 569–601.

11. Pathare, P.B., Opara, U.L. and Al-Said, F.A.J. (2013). Colour measurement and analysis in fresh and processed foods: A review. Food Bioprocess Technol. 6: 36–60.

12. Rahman, M.M., Hossain, M.M., Rahim, M.A., Rubel, M.H.K. and Islam, M.Z. (2018). Effect of pre-harvest fruit bagging on post-harvest quality of guava cv. Swarupkathi. Fundam. Appl. Agric. 3(1): 363–371.

13. Sharma, R.R., Singh, D. and Kumar, K. (2020). Influence of on-the-tree fruit bagging on biotic stresses and postharvest quality of rainy-season crop of ‘Allahabad Safeda’ guava (Psidium guajava L.). Crop Prot. 135: 105216.

14. Singh, G. (2011). High density planting in guava—application of canopy management. Acta Hort. 849: 225–232.

15. Singh, G., Singh, A.K. and Rajan, S. (2007). Influence of pre-harvest fruit bagging on fruit quality of guava (Psidium guajava L.). Acta Hort. 735: 597–602.

16. Srivastava, K.K., Soni, S.K., Kumar, D. and Dwivedi, S.K. (2023). Effect of different bagging materials on guava fruit physiology and its quality attributes. J. Plant Growth Regul. 28(2): 238–246.

17. Vicente, A.R., Saladié, M., Rose, J.K.C. and Labavitch, J.M. (2007). The linkage between cell wall metabolism and fruit softening. J. Sci. Food Agric. 87(8): 1435–1448.

18. Zaid A, Singh A, Hameed S, Singh A, Priya P and Ramola A (2026). Assessment of morphological and biochemical diversity in guava genotypes. Int. J. Adv. Biochem. Res. 10(6S): 1002–1007. DOI: 10.33545/26174693.2026.v10.i6Sl.876

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)