Variations in the hybrid progeny of low chill white × yellow fleshed peaches
Downloads
Published
Keywords:
Prunus persica (L.) Batsch, fruit quality, inheritance, antioxidantsIssue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Abstract
Low chill Flordaglo (White flesh) × Florda Prince (Yellow flesh) hybrid population was studied for variations in flower and fruit traits. Useful variations in flower density, fruit density, fruit weight, fruit colour, fruit size and biochemical compounds was observed in the population. The hybrids showed variability for biochemical characters like total soluble solids (TSS), total sugars, reducing sugars, acidity, ascorbic acid, total phenols, antioxidant capacity, anthocyanin level and carotenoids. The range of biochemical characters in hybrids even exceeded that of the parents showing superiority of some hybrids to the parental varieties. Useful variation in fruit weight, fruit colour, fruit size and biochemical characters have been observed in the populations and the plants have been identified. Transgressive segregation has also been observed for fruit weight, size, TSS, carotenoids, phenols and extent of fruit colour. A significant positive correlation was found between flower density and fruit density (r = 0.9); fruit diameter and fruit length (r = 0.9); fruit weight and fruit diameter (r = 0.9); total sugars and TSS (r = 0.5); anthocyanin and total sugar content (r = 0.5); phenols and antioxidant activity (r = 0.4). The loci governing these traits seem to be combining in additive fashion in the population. The results from the chi-square test (χ2) for the goodness of fit showed that the segregation ratio for flesh colour in the Flordaglo × Florda Prince F1 population, fits in the BC1 F1 population which is 1:1. Hence, the flesh colour seems to be governed by single gene.
How to Cite
Downloads
References
Ayub, H., Ahmad, A., Amir, R.M. and Irshad,
G. 2021. Multivariate analysis of peach quality
treatedwith essential oil coatings. J. Food Proc.
Preserv.45: e15083.
Barnes, J. D., Balaguer, L., Elvira, M., Elvira, S.
and Davison, A. W. 1992. A reappraisal of the use
of DMSO for the extraction amd determination of
chlorophylls a and b in lichens and higher plants.
Env. Exp. Bot. 32: 85-100.
Bassi, D. and Monet, R. 2008. Botany and
Taxonomy. In: The Peach: Botany, Production and
Uses(Ed.), C. A. B. I., Oxfordshire, U. K. pp. 1-36.
Boonprakob, U. and Byrne, D.H. 2003.
Temperature influences blind node development
in peach. Acta Hortic. 618: 463-67.
Brooks, S.J., Moore, J.N. and Murphy, J.B. 2019.
Quantitative and qualitative changes in sugar
content of peach genotypes [Prunus persica (L.)
Batsch.]. J. Amer. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 118: 1-7.
Cantin, C.M., Gogorcena, Y. and Moreno, M.A.
Phenotypic diversity and relationships
of fruit quality traits in peach and nectarine
[Prunus persica (L.) Batsch] breeding progenies.
Euphytica.171: 211-26.
Da Silva Linge, C., Bassi, D., Bianco, L.,
Pacheco, I, Pirona, R. and Rossini, L. 2015.
Genetic dissection of fruit weight and size in an
F2
peach (Prunus persica (L.) Batsch) progeny.
Mol. Breed. 35: 71
Dai, Z.W., Meddar, M., Renaud, C., Merlin, I.,
Hilbert, G., Delrot, S. and Gomes, E. 2014.
Long-term in vitro culture of grape berries and its
application to assess the effects of sugar supply
on anthocyanin accumulation. J.Exp. Bot.65:
-77.
Dirlewanger, E., Pronier, V., Parvery, C., Rothan,
C., Guye, A. and Monet, R. 1998. Genetic
linkage map of peach (PrunuspersicaL.) using
morphological and molecular markers. Theor.
Appl. Genet.97: 888-95.
Dubois, M., Gilles, K. A., Hamilton, K., Rebers,
P.A. and Smith, F. 1956. Colorimetric method for
determination of sugars and related substances.
Anal. Chem. 28: 350-56.
Falchi, R., Vendramin, E., Zanon, L., Scalabrin,
S., Cipriani, G., Ignazio, V., Vizzotto, G. and Morgante, M. 2013. Three distinct mutational
mechanisms acting on a single gene underpin the
origin of yellow flesh in peach. Plant J.76: 175-87.
FAOSTAT. 2019. FAO statistic division, Agriculture
data. http://apps.fao.org/page/ HYPERLINK
“http://apps.fao.org/page/collections”HYPERLINK
“http://apps.fao.org/page/collections”collections.
Hancock, J.F., Scorza, R. and Lobos, G.A. 2008.
Peaches. In: Hancock J F (eds). Temperate Fruit
Crop Breed. Springer, U.S.pp: 256-98.
Liu, H., Jiang, W., Cao, J. and Li, Y. 2019. Changes
in extractable and non-extractable polyphenols
and their antioxidant properties during fruit ontree ripening in five peach cultivars. Hortic. Plant
J.5: 137-44.
Milatovic, D., Nikolic, D. and Durovic, D. 2010.
Variability, heritability and correlations of some
factors affecting productivity in peach. HortSci.37:
-87.
Mokrani, A., Krisa, S., Cluzet, S., Da Costa,
G., Temsamani, H., Renouf, E., Mérillon, J.M.,
Madani, K., Mesnil, M., Monvoisin, and Richard,
T. 2015. Phenolic contents and bioactive
potential of peach fruit extracts. Food Chem.
: 212-20.
Nelson, N. 1944. A photometric adaptation of
the Somogyi method for the determination of
glucose. J. Biol. Chem. 153: 375-80.
Rajput, P., Thakur A., Singh, H., Singh, J., Kaur,
S., Koulagi, R. and Pathak, D (2021) Screening
of peach rootstock hybrids for resistance to rootknot nematode. Indian J. Hortic. 78: 134-41.
Swain, T. and Hill, W. E. 1959. Phenolic
constituents of Prunusdomestica, quantitative
analysis of phenolics constituents. J. Sci. Food.
Agri. 10: 63-68.
Vileila-Morales, E.A., Sherman, W.B., Wilcox,
C.L. and Andrews, C.P. 1981. Inheritance of short
fruit development period in peach. J. Amer. Soc.
Hort. Sci. 106: 399-401.