Utilization of the most recent GGE biplot to locate stable genotypes in turmeric using the well-liked Eberheart Russell stability model
Stability Analysis of Turmeric in Different Agro-Climatic Zones of Chhattisgarh
Downloads
Published
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58993/ijh/2026.83.1.3Keywords:
Indigenous turmeric, AMMI and GGE biplots, genotype × environment interaction, rhizome yieldIssue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Shrikant L. Sawargaonkar, A.K. Singh, M.K. Sahu, S. Agrawal, B. Patel

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
GGE and AMMI biplot methods with Eberhart and Russell regression model were applied on the set of twelve indigenous turmeric genotypes grown in nine environments for quick and relevant method to delineate genotype by environment interaction, stable genotypes and environmental discrimination. The average rhizome yield over the locations was depicted as 12.01 ton/ha, which ranged from 7.87 ton/ha (Jagdalpur) to 20.02 ton/ha (Raigarh). The genotype CG Haldi 2 (16.61 ton/ha) exhibited the highest rhizome yield followed by IT 36 (15.00 ton/ha), over national checks Roma (13.53 ton/ha), Suranjana (11.73 ton/ha) and over local check CG Haldi -1 (10.57 ton/ha). As per Eberhart and Russell model, the genotypes CG Haldi 2 (IT 10), CG Raigarh Haldi-3 (IT 36), Roma, and Narendra Haldi -1 were best performing entries while the performance of BSR 2, IT 38, Suranjana, CG Haldi-1, IT 7, and IT 8 were varied with change in environments. In AMMI analysis, IPCA 1 (62.60 %), IPCA 2 (21.80 %), IPCA 3 (11.70 %), and IPCA 4 (2.60 %) were explained the interaction mean squares, respectively. While, in GGE biplot, PC 1 and PC 2 captured 47.28 % and 34.62 % interaction variation, respectively. The genotypes T-111 (CG Haldi-2), T-101 (IT 36), and national check T-106 (Roma) were high yielding and as well as found stable in GGE and AMMI-1 biplot. The test environments RG 17, RG 16 and RG 15 exhibited different niches, whereas, AM 17, AM 16, JD 16, JD 17, JD 15 and AM 15 were representative with better discriminating ability. Between biplot models applied, the GGE biplots were clear in visualization for polygon view, genotypic stability and environmental discrimination. The GGE method considered both G+GE for biplot generation and found most suitable for stability analysis.Abstract
How to Cite
Downloads
1. Anandaraj, M., Prasatha, D., Kandiannana, K., John T. Z., Srinivasana, V., Jha, A.K., Singh, B.K., Singh, A.K., Pandey, V.P., Singh, S.P., Shoba, N., Jana, J.C., Ravindra K. and Maheswari U. 2014. Genotype by environment interaction effects on yield and curcumin in turmeric (Curcuma longa L.). Ind. Crop Prod. 53:358-364. 2. Dehghani, H., Ebadi, A. and Yousefi, A. 2006. Biplot analysis of genotype by environment interaction for barley yield in Iran. Agron. J. 98:388-393. 3. Eberhart, S.A. and Russell, W.A. 1966. Stability parameters for comparing varieties. Crop Sci. 6:36-40. 4. Flores, F., Moreno, M.T. and Cubero, J.I. 1998. A comparison of univariate and multivariate methods to analyse G×E interaction. Field Crops Res. 56:271-286. 5. Gauch, H.G. 2006. Statistical analysis of yield trials by AMMI and GGE. Crop Sci. 46:488- 500. 6. Gauch, H.G., Piepho, H.P. and Annicchiarico, P. 2008. Statistical analysis of yield trials by AMMI and GGE: Further considerations. Crop Sci. 48:866-889. 7. Kang, M.S., Ma B., Woods, S. and Cornelius, P.L. 2007. GGE biplot vs. AMMI analysis of genotype-by-environment data. Crop Sci. 47:643-653. 8. Muthusamy, A. 2013. A study on export on performance on Indian Turmeric. Ind. J. Appl. Res. 3:54 9. Rad, M.R.N., Kadir, M.A., Rafii, M.Y., Jaafar, H.Z., Naghavi, M.R. and Ahmadi, F. 2013. Genotype× environment interaction by AMMI and GGE biplot analysis in three consecutive generations of wheat (Triticum aestivum) under normal and drought stress conditions. Aust. J. Crop Sci. 7:956–61. 10. Srikrishnah, S. and Sutharsan, S. 2015. Effect of different shade levels on growth and tuber yield of turmeric (Curcuma longa L.) in the Batticaloa district of Sri Lanka. Amer. J. Agril. Env. Sci. 15: 813-816. 11. Suresh, D., Manjunatha H. and Srinivasan, K. 2008. Effect of heat processing of spices on the concentrations of their bioactive principles: turmeric (Curcuma longa), red pepper (Capsicum annuum) and black pepper (Piper nigrum). J Food Compos Anal. 20:346- 351. 12. Weiss, E.A. 2002. Spice crops. CABI Publishing, Wallingfoard. 43. 13. Yan, W. and Tinker, N.A. 2006. Biplot analysis of multi-environment trial data: principles and applications. Cand. J. Plant Sci. 86:623-645. 14. Yan, W., Hunt, L.A., Sheng, Q. and Sulavnics, Z. 2000. Cultivar evaluation and mega-environment investigation based on the GGE biplot. Crop Sci. 40:597-605. 15. Yan, W., Kang, M.S., Ma, B., Woods, S. and Cornelius, P. L. 2007. GGE biplot vs. AMMI analysis of genotype-by-environment data. Crop Sci., 47(2):643–653.
References
Similar Articles
- Pratapsingh S. Khapte, Madhavi Reddy K, Naresh Ponnam, Boraiah K. M, G.C. Wakchaure, Gurumurthy S, Evaluation of CGMS-based chilli F1 hybrids for morphometric, fruit quality and yield traits , Indian Journal of Horticulture: Vol. 80 No. 04 (2023): Indian Journal of Horticulture
- Rahul Kumar, V. K. Tripathi, Influence on yield and quality attributes of cape gooseberry (Physalis peruviana L.) with the application of nitrogen, zinc and boron , Indian Journal of Horticulture: Vol. 82 No. 04 (2025): Indian Journal of Horticulture
- J Suresh Kumar, M K Pandit, Studies on heterosis, combining ability and gene action for earliness, yield and yield components in sponge gourd , Indian Journal of Horticulture: Vol. 77 No. 01 (2020): Indian Journal of Horticulture
- Dechin Droka, Raj Kumar, Subodh Joshi, R.K. Yadav, Genetics of yield and yield contributing traits in tomato under low temperature grown climatic regime , Indian Journal of Horticulture: Vol. 70 No. 2 (2013): Indian Journal of Horticulture
- D. Jamatia, R.A. Kaushik, D.P. Deshmukh, K.D. Ameta, R.B. Dubey, Variability, character association and path coefficient analysis in rat tail radish , Indian Journal of Horticulture: Vol. 72 No. 01 (2015): Indian Journal of Horticulture
- Panch R. Mirjha, D.S. Rana, Anil K. Choudhary, A.K. Dubey, Influence of cultivars, cropping systems and nutrient levels on yield and quality of mango in north India , Indian Journal of Horticulture: Vol. 75 No. 01 (2018): Indian Journal of Horticulture
- Kaluram ., Jai Prakash, S. K. Singh, A. K. Goswami, Preeti Singh, Zakir Hussain, A. K. Singh, Genetic diversity in qualitative and quantitative traits of papaya , Indian Journal of Horticulture: Vol. 75 No. 02 (2018): Indian Journal of Horticulture
- Tithi Dutta, Swadesh Banerjee, Tridip Bhattacharjee, Praveen Kumar Maurya, Subhramalya Dutta, Arup Chattopadhyay, Pranab Hazra, Heterosis breeding for improving quality traits in brinjal for export in the tropics , Indian Journal of Horticulture: Vol. 76 No. 03 (2019): Indian Journal of Horticulture
- K. Elayaraja, R.N. Gadag, Jyoti Kumari, Upama Mishra, Gene action and heterosis for yield and kernel quality traits in experimental hybrids in sweet corn relevant for Indian conditions , Indian Journal of Horticulture: Vol. 77 No. 01 (2020): Indian Journal of Horticulture
- Hemlata Bharti, P. Manivel, Bishal Gurung, Jitendra Kumar, Multivariate analysis of yield associated traits in Safed musli (Chlorophytum borivilianum) genotypes under semi-arid conditionsa , Indian Journal of Horticulture: Vol. 74 No. 02 (2017): Indian Journal of Horticulture
<< < 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 > >>
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.
